Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) constitutional review
B) judicial review
C) statutory interpretation
D) congressional oversight
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) John Marshall
B) James Madison
C) Alexander Hamilton
D) James Wilson
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) must nominate law-school graduates to federal judgeships.
B) can nominate whomever they wish to federal judgeships.
C) must nominate someone with a rating of "well qualified" from the American Bar Association.
D) typically allow U.S. senators to tell them whom to nominate for federal judgeships.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) making unanimous decisions.
B) employing political justifications for overturning precedent.
C) expressing minority views through dissents.
D) ruling in favor of the side with public opinion behind it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Court has only nine members.
B) The justices cannot set the judicial agenda and can only choose from cases appealed to it.
C) The president can change the size of the Court if the president disagrees with its decisions.
D) The Court is required to follow the dictates of precedent even when its justices disagree with those precedents.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) involves one litigant.
B) involves many litigants.
C) is banned in most states.
D) is a poor way to provide accountability and justice in our economic system.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) No presidential nomination to the federal judiciary has been filibustered in U.S. history.
B) The nuclear option was invoked by the Republicans during Bill Clinton's presidency.
C) Both major parties have been willing to use the filibuster to block judicial nominees.
D) Presidential nominations to the federal courts have not been very controversial for the past 25 years.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It can only be used if the mootness criterion is also used.
B) It allows the Supreme Court to duck hearing politically sensitive cases by ruling that the plaintiff does not have standing.
C) It helps interest groups know whether or not they can submit an amicus curiae brief.
D) It supports the Rule of Four in helping Supreme Court justices decide which cases to hear.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) senatorial courtesy
B) precedent
C) amicus curiae
D) judicial activism
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) provides too much power to the majority.
B) is undemocratic because it gives nine unelected judges enormous power.
C) is undemocratic because a minority of the Court can affect national policy.
D) creates liberal bias in the system because most justices are former lawyers from Ivy League universities.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) patronage
B) seniority
C) random chance
D) the wishes of the clerk
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) allowed the Court to become an equal partner in the institutional balance of power.
B) ensured the survival of dual federalism.
C) ensured that the rights of the majority would prevail.
D) allowed the Court to have the final say on all national laws and policies.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) are always liberal.
B) tend to take a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
C) tend to uphold precedent most of the time.
D) can be conservative.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) attorney general
B) chief justice
C) solicitor general
D) federal chief procurator
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Showing 21 - 40 of 85
Related Exams