Filters
Question type

What did the judgment in Case C-224/01 K


A) That the Member State may be liable to be fined if an incomplete documentation file is sent to the ECJ when a national court makes a request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU.
B) That the Member State may be subject to a fine if the question referred to the ECJ is hypothetical.
C) That the Member State may be liable for failure of its court of final instance to refer a case to the ECJ.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What matters can be referred by national courts to the ECJ under Article 267 TFEU for a preliminary ruling?


A) Matters concerning the validity of primary sources of EU law.
B) Matters concerning the interpretation of the Treaties and the interpretation and validity of acts adopted by EU institutions.
C) Matters concerning the validity of judgments of the ECJ.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

B

What did the judgment in Case 314/85 Foto-Frost specify regarding the referral concerning validity of EU acts?


A) Any national court can declare an EU act invalid by applying the tests developed by the ECJ.
B) National courts have no power to declare an EU act invalid.
C) Only the highest national courts can declare an EU act invalid.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

B

What is the meaning of the doctrine of


A) The term means that the Commission must bring proceedings before the ECJ against a Member State when it is clear that a Member State has breached EU law.
B) The doctrine means that Article 267 (3) TFEU imposes an obligation upon the courts of last instance to ask for a preliminary ruling each time the interpretation of EU law is at issue.
C) The doctrine means that Article 267 (3) TFEU imposes no obligation upon the courts of last instance to ask for a preliminary ruling when the correct application of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt as to the manner in which the question raised should be resolved.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

C

Why was the request for a preliminary ruling refused by the ECJ in Case 104/79 Foglia v Novello?


A) The request was made outside the time limit for a reference to be made.
B) There was no genuine dispute between the parties.
C) Proceedings before the national referring court had already been terminated.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 5 of 5

Related Exams

Show Answer