Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

The Supreme Court created the legal principle in which the introduction of criminal evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the Constitution is forbidden. This principle is known as:


A) Probable cause requirement
B) Derivate evidence rule
C) Exclusionary rule
D) Four corners rule

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Application of the exclusionary rule by the states was mandated in _____________ v. Ohio.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Match up the court case to the significant outcome : -Mapp v. Ohio


A) Established the good faith exception.
B) Established the inevitability of discovery exceptions.
C) First case to consider throw-away evidence
D) Address the application of the exclusionary rule to civil cases.
E) The application of the Exclusionary Rule to the states and state law enforcement officers.
F) Precursor case to Mapp v. Ohio, which allowed evidence of narcotics that had been involuntary pumping of a stomach to be admissible.
G) The court introduced the Exclusionary Rule.
H) Furthered the derivative rule by allowing evidence to be submitted because the paint and paintbrush had been illegally obtained by the vandal.
I) Introduced the notion of the fruits of the poisonous tree.
J) Established the three-prong test for the evaluation of attenuation.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

____________ evidence may be admissible if the state can demonstrate that the causal connection between the illegal action and the seizure of the evidence is sufficiently attenuated.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Application of the exclusionary rule by the states was mandated in Fahy v. Connecticut.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The exclusionary rule is grounded in the United States Constitution.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Rochin v. California, the Court considered whether evidence of narcotics, which had been obtained through the involuntary stomach pumping of the defendant, should be admissible.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Good Faith evidence may be admissible if the state can demonstrate that the evidence was discovered while the officers were acting with _____________ assurance of the validity of their action.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The 1914 case of Weeks v. U.S. the Supreme Court created a law which excluded any evidence that had been collected in violation of the statute or procedure.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The good faith exception argues that the exclusionary rule was designed to deter police misconduct rather that to punish the errors of judges and magistrates.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which 1914 case did the Supreme Court create a law that excluded any evidence which had been collected in violation of statute or procedure?


A) Weeks v. U.S.
B) Mapp v. Ohio
C) Elkins v. U.S.
D) Fahy v. Connecticut

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The silver platter doctrine allowed state authorities to serve up ____________ obtained evidence to federal agents.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

As stated, the exclusionary rule is one of the most controversial legal issues in criminal justice. Unlike other such rules, it is not grounded in the United States Constitution, but is simply a judicial remedy for violations involving the _________ Amendment.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Match up the court case to the significant outcome : -United States v. Leon


A) Established the good faith exception.
B) Established the inevitability of discovery exceptions.
C) First case to consider throw-away evidence
D) Address the application of the exclusionary rule to civil cases.
E) The application of the Exclusionary Rule to the states and state law enforcement officers.
F) Precursor case to Mapp v. Ohio, which allowed evidence of narcotics that had been involuntary pumping of a stomach to be admissible.
G) The court introduced the Exclusionary Rule.
H) Furthered the derivative rule by allowing evidence to be submitted because the paint and paintbrush had been illegally obtained by the vandal.
I) Introduced the notion of the fruits of the poisonous tree.
J) Established the three-prong test for the evaluation of attenuation.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The first case in which "throw-away" evidence was considered wat that of:


A) U.S. v. Hall
B) Hester v. U.S.
C) Weeks v. U.S.
D) U.S. v. Pervaz

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Court has ruled that the voluntary ___________ of an item negates any expectation of privacy that an individual may claim to it in the future.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Match up the court case to the significant outcome : -Wong Sun v. United States


A) Established the good faith exception.
B) Established the inevitability of discovery exceptions.
C) First case to consider throw-away evidence
D) Address the application of the exclusionary rule to civil cases.
E) The application of the Exclusionary Rule to the states and state law enforcement officers.
F) Precursor case to Mapp v. Ohio, which allowed evidence of narcotics that had been involuntary pumping of a stomach to be admissible.
G) The court introduced the Exclusionary Rule.
H) Furthered the derivative rule by allowing evidence to be submitted because the paint and paintbrush had been illegally obtained by the vandal.
I) Introduced the notion of the fruits of the poisonous tree.
J) Established the three-prong test for the evaluation of attenuation.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under what circumstances are the fruits of the poisonous tree allowed to be introduced as evidence?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Although the exclusionary rule was desig...

View Answer

The silver platter doctrine allows state authorities to serve up illegally obtained evidence to federal agents.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The exclusionary rule also applies to civil cases

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 62

Related Exams

Show Answer