FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 4: Ethical and Social Issues in Information Systems

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 51

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

European privacy protection is ________ than in the United States.

A) less far-reaching
B) less liable to laws
C) much less stringent
D) much more stringent

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 52

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

The ethical "no free lunch" rule states that

A) if an action cannot be taken repeatedly, then it is not right to be taken at any time.
B) one should take the action that produces the least harm or incurs the least cost.
C) one can put values in rank order and understand the consequences of various courses of action.
D) everything is owned by someone else, and that the creator wants compensation for this work.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 53

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

A colleague of yours frequently takes for his own personal use small amounts of office supplies, noting that the loss to the company is minimal. You counter that if everyone were to take the office supplies, the loss would no longer be minimal. Your rationale expresses which historical ethical principle?

The European Parliament has passed a ban on unsolicited commercial messaging.

Despite the passage of several laws defining and addressing computer crime, accessing a computer system without authorization is not yet a federal crime.

Which of the following U.S. laws gives patients access to personal medical records and the right to authorize how this information can be used or disclosed?

"Look and feel" copyright infringement lawsuits are concerned with

Technostress is a computer-related malady whose symptoms include fatigue.

Protection for trade secrets is enforced at the federal level.

Which of the following adjusts copyright laws to the Internet age by making it illegal to circumvent technology-based protections of copyrighted materials?