FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 3: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 21

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

A default judgment is a judgment entered against the party who brought the claim before the court.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 22

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

The case of Max v.National Credit Co.is heard in a trial court.The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co.v.Refrigerated Transport, Inc.is heard in an appellate court.The difference between a trial and an appellate court is whether

A) the proceedings focus on the presentation of evidence and the examination of witnesses.
B) the court is appealing.
C) the parties question how the law applies to their dispute.
D) the subject matter of the case involves complex facts.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 23

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

iTablets, Inc., files a suit against Andromeda Pads Corporation.Suri is a witness for iTablets.Kevin is a witness for Andromeda.iTablets may direct interrogatories to

Fact Pattern 3-1?Bean Vendors, Inc., and Java Bistros Corporation dispute a term in their contract. -Refer to Fact Pattern 3-1.The least expensive method of resolving the dispute between Bean and Java may be

Any judgment is enforceable.

Tyler, a citizen of West Virginia, files a suit in a West Virginia state court against Louisville Sales Corporation, a Kentucky state company that does business in West Virginia.The court has original jurisdiction, which means that

State courts cannot have exclusive jurisdiction.

Milo files a suit against Nick in an Ohio state court, noting that Nick operates a Web site through which Ohio residents have done substantial business with him.The court is most likely to have jurisdiction over Nick if Milo's claim arises from

Concurrent jurisdiction exists when both federal and state courts have the power to hear a particular case.

Sandy, a resident of Illinois, wants to file suit against Carl, a resident of Kansas, over Carl's failure to pay Sandy for work on his house.The amount in dispute is $15,000.Under diversity of citizenship requirementse

Most online dispute resolution services apply general, universal legal principles to resolve disputes.

A closing argument is a statement by a party that results in a summary judgment in that party's favor.

A business firm may have to comply with the laws of any jurisdiction in which it actively targets customers.

Hua, a resident of Illinois, owns a warehouse in Indiana.A dispute arises over the ownership of the warehouse with Jac, a resident of Kentucky.Jac files a suit against Hua in Indiana.Regarding this suit, Indiana has

U.S.district courts have original jurisdiction in federal matters.

Arbitration is always legally binding.

A state court can exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who does business in the state over the Internet.

Fact Pattern 3-1?Bean Vendors, Inc., and Java Bistros Corporation dispute a term in their contract. -Refer to Fact Pattern 3-1.If Bean and Java resolve their dispute by having a neutral third party render a binding decision, they will have used the method of

An answer never admits to the allegations made in a complaint.

Discount Mart, Inc., files a suit in a state court against Elements Computer Corporation, alleging that Elements breached a contract to sell 500 notebook computers to Discount.During the course of the suit, Discount files a motion for judgment on the pleadings, Elements files a motion for a directed verdict, and both parties file motions for summary judgment.When and for what purpose are each of these motions made?