Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

In proving fraud, which of the following is true in case of reliance by the victim?


A) The reliance need not be solely on the false assertion.
B) The defendant can win a case by demonstrating that the plaintiff would have assented to the contract even without misrepresentation.
C) If the victim fails to read documents which give him the true facts, he can complain that he relied on contrary statements.
D) The rule of reliance applies to statements about the occurrence of events in the past, present, and future.
E) If the statement is one that concerns matters peculiarly within the person's purview, he would be held to have justifiably relied on the other party's false assertion.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

a(n. _____ is one that would be likely to induce a reasonable person to manifest his assent.


A) innocent misrepresentation
B) rescission
C) duress
D) misstatement of fact
E) material misrepresentation

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

With reference to assertions of intention, which of the following is NOT true?


A) Usually, assertions of intention are not considered facts.
B) The right to misstate intentions is useful chiefly in the acquisition of business.
C) To be a misrepresentation that will permit rescission, an assertion of intention must be false at the time made.
D) To render a contract voidable, the false assertion of intention must be harmful in some way to other interests of the recipient.
E) The law allows considerable leeway in the honesty of assertions of intention.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

B

Which of the following led to the final decision by the court in the Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. case?


A) The contract did not develop Vokes' dancing abilities.
B) The contract did not develop Vokes' dance aptitude.
C) The contract led to Vokes having difficulty in hearing the musical beat.
D) There was an assertion of intentions.
E) The contract was a misrepresentation of assertion of opinion.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

John, age 16, bought a hot car from Seller; John smashed up the car. The majority rule is that he may disaffirm, but his recovery will be limited to the depreciated value of the car.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a contract with an infant, _____.


A) eighteen-year-olds may assent to binding contracts
B) if the contract has been executed, the infant would be relieved from facing more arduous consequences
C) if the contract is executory, the infant will be liable under a quasi-contract
D) the infant will lose his power to accept the contract if the rights of third parties intervene
E) if a tort suit is an indirect method of enforcing a contract, infants will not be held liable for their torts

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A contract made by a person under guardianship is voidable.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

On May 1st Dubious sold Rodney Thermal (Hot Rod), who was two weeks shy of his 18th birthday, a 2003 Bulgemobile Turboturgid Mark VI automobile for $9,000. Hot Rod made a down payment, and agreed to pay $250 per month on the balance. When Hot Rod applied for insurance with Goodhands Insurance Co. he signed a "Notice of Rejection," declining to purchase uninsured motorist coverage (which was not required in the jurisdiction). One week later an uninsured motorist crashed into the car; Hot Rod sought to disaffirm his rejection of the insurance on the basis of his infancy. Four weeks later-having made one payment-he sought to disaffirm his purchase of the car entirely. a. May Hot Rod disaffirm his rejection of the insurance as he wants to? b. May he disaffirm the contract entirely? a) No, Hot Rod cannot disaffirm his rejection of the contract. An infant may avoid his or her contract, but the rule is not that the infant may avoid or disaffirm the rejection of a contract. b) No, Hot Rod cannot disaffirm the contract entirely. After reaching majority, an infant has a reasonable time to disaffirm contracts made during infancy, but if the infant performs a part of the contract after reaching majority, the contract is said to be ratified by the infant and it cannot be avoided.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

a) No, Hot Rod cannot disaffirm his reje...

View Answer

Fraud in the inducement makes the agreement void.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A unilateral mistake of fact is usually grounds for avoiding a contract.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An infant will lose the power to avoid a contract if the rights of third parties intervene.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Konic International Corporation, v. Spokane Computer Services, Inc., which of the following led to the final decision by the court?


A) There was a mistake on part of Young who did not have the authority to order the equipment.
B) The contract was made intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
C) The mistake was mutual, relating to a failure of communication.
D) There was a misstatement of fact by Konic.
E) There was a fraudulent misrepresentation.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Identify the correct statement in proving fraudulent misrepresentation.


A) Concealment is a more passive type of nondisclosure.
B) Nondisclosure of a fact operates as a misrepresentation under all circumstances.
C) The act of concealment should be direct.
D) Concealment may consist of diverting the other party from gaining the necessary knowledge.
E) Sales puffery is considered a fact.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A defendant can win a case by solely demonstrating that the plaintiff would have assented to the contract even without the misrepresentation.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A person who was intoxicated at the time he made a contract cannot subsequently ratify it.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

Which of the following is true with regard to misrepresentation?


A) Fraud in the execution is defined as some misrepresentation about the subject of the contract.
B) Fraud in the inducement is defined as a misrepresentation as to the character of the contract.
C) If a misrepresentation is intentional, it is non-fraudulent.
D) If a misrepresentation is unintentional, it is fraudulent.
E) A non-fraudulent misrepresentation can be innocent.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What are the requirements for a real assent? What are the various remedies available in case an agreement is not made under real assent?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An agreement is enforceable if the parti...

View Answer

Fraud in the execution involves some misrepresentation about the subject of the contract that stimulates assent.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the case of mutual mistake, relief may be granted if the mistake concerns a basic assumption on which the contract was made.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true about undue influence?


A) It is a harsher form of duress.
B) The unfairness does not lie in any misrepresentation.
C) Usually the fact pattern involves the victim receiving advice from most people except the persuader.
D) A contract made under undue influence stands void.
E) The perpetrator threatens the victim to assent to the contract.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 33

Related Exams

Show Answer